Supreme Court: Citizens Have Right to Criticise Judgments, Judiciary Should Not Be ‘Oversensitive’

Written by TET Newsroom

Updated at: Apr 10, 2026

2 min read

Supreme Court: Citizens Have Right to Criticise Judgments, Judiciary Should Not Be ‘Oversensitive’ The Eastern Times

NewDelhi: The Supreme Court of India on Friday made an important observation — people have the fundamental right to criticise court judgments, and the judiciary should not be “oversensitive” to such views.

A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, along with Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi, said that healthy criticism is part of a strong democracy.

What Did the Court Say?

The Chief Justice clearly stated:

  • People can express their opinions on court rulings

  • Even if someone feels a judgment goes against public interest, they can say so

  • Criticism of judgments is not an attack on the judiciary

The bench remarked:
“Why should the judiciary be so oversensitive? People have a right to criticise our judgments.”

What Was the Case About?

The court was hearing a petition against an old NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook.

  • The book mentioned that some recent judgments view slum dwellers as encroachers

  • The petitioner wanted this line removed

The Supreme Court refused to delete it, saying:

  • It is just a viewpoint, not an insult

  • Textbooks can present different perspectives

Centre Forms Expert Committee

During the hearing, the Central Government informed the court that a high-level expert committee has been formed to review content related to the judiciary.

Members include:

  • Former Attorney General K.K. Venugopal

  • Former Supreme Court judge Justice Indu Malhotra

  • Former SC judge Justice Aniruddha Bose

Free Speech vs Contempt

This ruling reinforces an important principle:

  • Fair and reasonable criticism is allowed

  • Personal attacks on judges can amount to contempt of court

The court made it clear that disagreeing with a judgment is not a crime — it is a democratic right.

Recommended Articles
Right to Die with Dignity: Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Life Support in Passive Euthanasia Case.
Right to Die with Dignity: Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Life Support in Passive Euthanasia Case.
Written by TET Newsroom · Updated at: Apr 12, 2026
Kharif Season at Risk? India Rushes to Secure Fertilizer from New Countries
Kharif Season at Risk? India Rushes to Secure Fertilizer from New Countries
Written by TET Newsroom · Updated at: Mar 25, 2026
World Happiness Report 2026: India at 116th Rank, Behind Nepal and Pakistan
World Happiness Report 2026: India at 116th Rank, Behind Nepal and Pakistan
Written by TET Newsroom · Updated at: Mar 23, 2026

Why This Matters

  • Strengthens freedom of speech

  • Encourages public debate on judgments

  • Shows that courts are open to scrutiny

This decision highlights that in a democracy, questioning decisions — even of the highest court — is both allowed and necessary.

Reader Feedback

Was this article useful?

Stay Connected

Get the next important story before you miss it.

Subscribe to the newsletter for trusted updates, or join our WhatsApp channel for quick top-story alerts from The Eastern Times.

WhatsApp Channel

Prefer instant alerts? Join our WhatsApp channel for top stories and breaking updates.

Join on WhatsApp

Follow Us

IPL logo2026Coverage
Advertise with us - contact The Eastern Times