Explained- New Zealand to Introduce Bill Restricting Social Media for Children Under 16

New Zealand plans to restrict social media use for children under 16.

📰 News in Short (≈60 words)

New Zealand is set to debate a bill that restricts children under 16 from using social media. Introduced by National Party lawmaker Catherine Wedd, the bill aims to reduce online harm and mental health risks. However, critics warn it could violate privacy and digital freedom. The bill follows Australia’s similar teen social media ban in 2024.


🧭 News in Detail (Explained & Analytical)

By: Editor, The Eastern Times

What is happening?

A bill to restrict social media use for children under 16 will soon be introduced in the New Zealand Parliament, officials announced on Thursday. The proposed law aims to safeguard young users from the increasing dangers of online platforms, such as cyberbullying, misinformation, and mental health issues.

This bill mirrors Australia’s landmark decision in 2024, which became the first in the world to impose age-based restrictions on social media usage.

Who introduced the bill?

The initiative comes from Catherine Wedd, a lawmaker from the ruling National Party. Her member’s bill, initially submitted in May 2025, was selected in a parliamentary ballot—a traditional lottery that allows non-cabinet lawmakers to propose legislation.

Although the bill has backing from National Party members, its coalition partners have yet to declare their support, leaving its parliamentary future uncertain.

What does the bill propose?

The bill seeks to require social media companies to implement an age-verification system before granting access to users. This would mean platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat must confirm a user’s age through reliable verification methods before allowing sign-ups.

The goal is to restrict children under 16 from creating or using social media accounts, addressing growing concerns over the impact of online content on young minds.

Why is this bill being introduced?

According to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, New Zealand must act to protect children from mental health harm caused by excessive social media use. He has repeatedly warned about dangers such as:

  • Cyberbullying and online harassment

  • Misinformation and fake news exposure

  • Unrealistic body image portrayals that damage self-esteem

These issues, Luxon argues, have contributed to rising anxiety, depression, and self-image concerns among New Zealand’s youth.

How does this connect to global trends?

New Zealand’s proposal aligns with international efforts to regulate young people’s digital experiences. Australia’s 2024 teen social media ban set a global precedent by requiring platforms to block underage users.

Countries like France and the UK are also considering age-verification systems to strengthen online safety. The New Zealand bill is part of this growing wave of “digital child protection” measures around the world.

What are the criticisms?

Not everyone supports the move. The civil liberties group PILLAR has criticized the proposal, calling it “lazy policymaking.”

PILLAR’s Executive Director Nathan Seiuli said the bill would do little to protect children but would instead “create serious privacy risks” and limit digital freedoms.
He argued that forcing citizens to share personal data for age verification could increase the risk of surveillance and data misuse by corporations or the government.

What happens next?

It’s still unclear when the bill will be introduced for formal debate. Meanwhile, a New Zealand parliamentary committee is already studying the broader issue of social media harm among youth.

A detailed report is expected by early 2026, exploring the roles of government, private companies, and civil society in tackling online risks.


Analysis — What does it mean for New Zealand?

If passed, this bill could mark a major shift in New Zealand’s approach to digital regulation, balancing child safety with online freedom.

However, the challenge lies in enforcing the rules without compromising privacy or freedom of expression. The outcome of this debate could influence future online safety laws not only in New Zealand but across the world.


Connect with us through social media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *